If humans and dinosaurs did not coexist, then who built this train:
Q. E. D.
Topics
9/11
Acquisition Reform
Advertising
Alaway
Alcohol
Ale
Allergies
Antisemitism
Barack H. Obama
Beer
Billiards
Biology
Books
Budget
Bureaucracy
California
Capitalism
Carbohydrates
Carcinogen
CDC
Chemical Warfare
Chemistry
Chemophobia
Chirality
Climate Science
Colonial Pines
Computers
Conservation Laws
Constitution
Consumerism
Cosmology
CPT Invariance
Creationism
Customer Service
Daesh
David Irving
Dead End
Defense
Dinosaurs
Disasters
Economic
Energy
English
Ethics
Evolution
Fluoride
Food
FTL
Garden Care
George W. Bush
Gerlich and Tscheuschner
GISS
Glaciers
GMOs
HadCRU
Haiti
Health
Himalayan Rock Salt
HITRAN
Holocaust Denial
Home Brewing
How It Looks From Here
html
Humor
Information
Infrared Spectroscopy
IPCC
Iran
ISIS
Islam
Islamophobia
Israel
Ketotifen Fumarate
Law
Lawn Care
Leibniz
Lisbon
Magnetism
Math
Medco
Medicine
Modeling
Molecules
Monopoly
Monsanto
Naphazoline hydrochloride
Neutrinos
Nietzsche
NIH
NIST
Noether's Theorem
Non-hazardous
Norton Ghost
Nuclear Warfare
Oil
Oil Spill
Olopatadine hydrochloride
Opinion
Orson Scott Card
Parody
Pataday
Patanol
Pesticides
Pheneramine maleate
Physics
Plumbing
Politics
Poll
Pope
POTUS
Prescriptions
Prop 65
Psychology
Quantum Mechanics
Quiz
Racism
Radiative Transfer
Relativity
Religion
Respiration
Senior Housing
Signs
Smoking
Specific Gravity
Statistics
Stock Market
Sugars
Sun Tzu
Surface Temperature
Surgeon General
Symantec
Target
Temperature
Terrorism
The Final Solution
The Holocaust History Project
Thermodynamics
Time
Trains
Units
Voltaire
von Clausewitz
Weather
White House
Wine
Yeast
Showing posts with label Creationism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Creationism. Show all posts
Sunday, August 25, 2013
Friday, March 25, 2011
The Second Law and Creationism
This post is part of a series,Nonsense and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The previous post is entitled Entropy and Information Theory.
Creationists and other people confused about the second law of thermodynamics often bring up some variant of the idea that life is somehow a counter-example the second law of thermodynamics. If entropy were disorder (which it is not), is it not obvious that life is highly ordered?
Therefore they seem to conclude that life is an example of decreasing entropy. The flaw in their thinking is not so much the confusion between disorder and entropy; the argument could be made with an accurate description of entropy. It would still be incorrect.
Creationists and other people confused about the second law of thermodynamics often bring up some variant of the idea that life is somehow a counter-example the second law of thermodynamics. If entropy were disorder (which it is not), is it not obvious that life is highly ordered?
Therefore they seem to conclude that life is an example of decreasing entropy. The flaw in their thinking is not so much the confusion between disorder and entropy; the argument could be made with an accurate description of entropy. It would still be incorrect.
Saturday, September 25, 2010
What the Second Law Does Not Say
This post is part of a series, Nonsense and the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
The Second Law does not say it is impossible for heat to be transferred from a cold body to a hot body. The second law does not say that "disorder" must increase on the earth or anywhere else. Life is not a counter-example to the second law; life is an example of the second law in action.
One has to be very careful about applying statistical results to a single molecule or a few molecules and remembering that increasing entropy applies to irreversible changes, not reversible ones. The second law says nothing about disorder. The second law does not prevent evaporative coolers from operating.
The second law does not contradict radiative transfer theory or global warming. The second law does not contradict conservation of energy. In applying the second law to cosmology, one should tread cautiously.
The Second Law does not say it is impossible for heat to be transferred from a cold body to a hot body. The second law does not say that "disorder" must increase on the earth or anywhere else. Life is not a counter-example to the second law; life is an example of the second law in action.
One has to be very careful about applying statistical results to a single molecule or a few molecules and remembering that increasing entropy applies to irreversible changes, not reversible ones. The second law says nothing about disorder. The second law does not prevent evaporative coolers from operating.
The second law does not contradict radiative transfer theory or global warming. The second law does not contradict conservation of energy. In applying the second law to cosmology, one should tread cautiously.
Nonsense and the Second Law of Thermodynamics
Introduction
The Second Law of Thermodynamics is, perhaps, the most abused physical law of all time. It may be rivaled for that distinction by the Uncertainty Principle, Relativity, and Hawking Radiation, but I think the Second Law probably wins the contest.
There is a plethora of nonsense disseminated on the web and elsewhere that misrepresents what the law actually says. This series is an attempt to curb some of that nonsense. Along the way, I hope to make some sense of what the second law of thermodynamics actually does say, as well as addressing some of the nonsense that people believe about it.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics is, perhaps, the most abused physical law of all time. It may be rivaled for that distinction by the Uncertainty Principle, Relativity, and Hawking Radiation, but I think the Second Law probably wins the contest.
There is a plethora of nonsense disseminated on the web and elsewhere that misrepresents what the law actually says. This series is an attempt to curb some of that nonsense. Along the way, I hope to make some sense of what the second law of thermodynamics actually does say, as well as addressing some of the nonsense that people believe about it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
