Topics
9/11
Acquisition Reform
Advertising
Alaway
Alcohol
Ale
Allergies
Antisemitism
Barack H. Obama
Beer
Billiards
Biology
Books
Budget
Bureaucracy
California
Capitalism
Carbohydrates
Carcinogen
CDC
Chemical Warfare
Chemistry
Chemophobia
Chirality
Climate Science
Colonial Pines
Computers
Conservation Laws
Constitution
Consumerism
Cosmology
CPT Invariance
Creationism
Customer Service
Daesh
David Irving
Dead End
Defense
Dinosaurs
Disasters
Economic
Energy
English
Ethics
Evolution
Fluoride
Food
FTL
Garden Care
George W. Bush
Gerlich and Tscheuschner
GISS
Glaciers
GMOs
HadCRU
Haiti
Health
Himalayan Rock Salt
HITRAN
Holocaust Denial
Home Brewing
How It Looks From Here
html
Humor
Information
Infrared Spectroscopy
IPCC
Iran
ISIS
Islam
Islamophobia
Israel
Ketotifen Fumarate
Law
Lawn Care
Leibniz
Lisbon
Magnetism
Math
Medco
Medicine
Modeling
Molecules
Monopoly
Monsanto
Naphazoline hydrochloride
Neutrinos
Nietzsche
NIH
NIST
Noether's Theorem
Non-hazardous
Norton Ghost
Nuclear Warfare
Oil
Oil Spill
Olopatadine hydrochloride
Opinion
Orson Scott Card
Parody
Pataday
Patanol
Pesticides
Pheneramine maleate
Physics
Plumbing
Politics
Poll
Pope
POTUS
Prescriptions
Prop 65
Psychology
Quantum Mechanics
Quiz
Racism
Radiative Transfer
Relativity
Religion
Respiration
Senior Housing
Signs
Smoking
Specific Gravity
Statistics
Stock Market
Sugars
Sun Tzu
Surface Temperature
Surgeon General
Symantec
Target
Temperature
Terrorism
The Final Solution
The Holocaust History Project
Thermodynamics
Time
Trains
Units
Voltaire
von Clausewitz
Weather
White House
Wine
Yeast
Saturday, April 30, 2011
Site Redesign
Frequent visitors may have noticed that I've redesigned the site. An unfortunate consequence is that two of the polls were lost; I've recreated them but lost the votes to date.
Second Law Poll
The purpose of this post is to document the final results of a poll on the site. I do not intend to comment on the results until I conclude my series on the second law of thermodynamics. It is worth noting at this point that there is no clear consensus on the correct answer from respondents.
I think that this fact is reflective of the state of confusion that exists in public discourse regarding the second law of thermodynamics.
The poll asked the respondents to pick an option to complete the statement: "The second law of thermodynamics states:"
The option were:
I think that this fact is reflective of the state of confusion that exists in public discourse regarding the second law of thermodynamics.
The poll asked the respondents to pick an option to complete the statement: "The second law of thermodynamics states:"
The option were:
- The disorder of the universe must increase.
- You can't win.
- The entropy of an isolated system must stay the same or increase.
- The entropy of a closed system must stay the same or increase.
- Heat cannot be transferred from a cold body to a hot body.
- The entropy of the world must increase.
- Let's keep score.
The results are shown in the following figure with truncated responses:
Sunday, April 24, 2011
The First Law of Thermodynamics
I need to take a tangent from my series on the second law of thermodynamics and discuss the first law of thermodynamics.
Heat is not a conserved quantity. Work is not a conserved quantity, but the sum of heat and work is a conserved quantity. The first law is related to the law of conservation of energy; in fact it is one case of that law.
Heat is not a conserved quantity. Work is not a conserved quantity, but the sum of heat and work is a conserved quantity. The first law is related to the law of conservation of energy; in fact it is one case of that law.
Friday, April 1, 2011
Entropy as a Religious, Spiritual or Self-Help Metaphor
This post is part of a series, Nonsense and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The previous post is entitled The Second Law and Creationism.
While browsing around the Internet for misuses of the term "entropy," I found some examples of the use of entropy as a metaphor. For example:
In human development and performance, entropy is somehow equated with limitations. It should be noted that if we go on to accept that people have limitations and a capacity for sin, then the natural pattern of human performance is not towards excellence but mediocrity. I say this because there are challenges, adversities, and even suffering, which are essential for healthy growth, although we don't normally seek or invite them. Overcoming these challenges, help us to see limitations as mere imaginations. Since entropy is very difficult to keep at bay, why must we continue to struggle against it in life? (Source)
I think that this paragraph has to be read as a somewhat confusing metaphor. It is not easy to characterize as a correct or incorrect understanding of entropy, but I suggest it is a bad metaphor. Entropy is not something that we can struggle against in the long term.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)