To those who pay attention to current events, it should be obvious that there is a widening rift between the United States and Israel. The rhetoric between the Israel Administration and the US Administration has grown to a fevered pitch as the prospect of a nuclear deal with Iran in March 2015 becomes more possible. Behind all of the rhetoric lies a legitimate policy difference.
Israel
Israel rightly perceives Iran and its proxies (Hezbollah, Hamas) to be an existential threat. Certainly the thought of Iran developing a nuclear warfare capability is frightening to Israel and its partisans. Such a capability could blunt Israel's strategic military advantage. It is not hard to imagine a skirmish with Hezbollah leading to nuclear blackmail or worse. If I were an Israeli citizen, I would be worried about such eventualities. I am, however, a US Citizen and my only national loyalty is to the United States.
The United States
The interests of the United States are often in concert with those of Israel; so it is no coincidence that the two countries cooperate in a very dangerous neighborhood. It is possible, however, for those interests to diverge and at this point in time (2015), I believe that they are divergent. The United States and its allies face a global threat from a loosely affiliated and sometimes competing array of Sunni groups that are either influenced by or closely in agreement with Wahhabism and or Salafism. These groups include Al Qaida, Daesh (ISIS), Al Shabab, and Boko Haram. Obviously, these groups also pose a threat to Israeli interests. All of these groups are blatantly Antisemitic. It is equally obvious that Iran and its proxies are a potential threat to US Interests (Consider the Khobar Towers incident, for example). I do not mean to make absolutist claims one way or the other.
In the current climate, however, detente between the US and Iran may be possible. Assuming that my enemy's enemy is my friend is a strategy that can backfire too often, but strategic non-aggression for the short term is very likely to be in US interests in fighting Daesh in Syria and Iraq. The nuclear negotiations between Iran and world powers must be seen in that light. While such non-aggression is in the short-term interests of the United States, it is not at all in the interest of Israel. To the United States, Iran and its proxies are a regional threat. Israel happens to be in the region, and to Israel, Iran and its proxies are an existential threat. I suggest that this is a rational policy difference between the two countries, one that can and should be responsibly debated, but unfortunately that debate has taken a darker turn.
Topics
9/11
Acquisition Reform
Advertising
Alaway
Alcohol
Ale
Allergies
Antisemitism
Barack H. Obama
Beer
Billiards
Biology
Books
Budget
Bureaucracy
California
Capitalism
Carbohydrates
Carcinogen
CDC
Chemical Warfare
Chemistry
Chemophobia
Chirality
Climate Science
Colonial Pines
Computers
Conservation Laws
Constitution
Consumerism
Cosmology
CPT Invariance
Creationism
Customer Service
Daesh
David Irving
Dead End
Defense
Dinosaurs
Disasters
Economic
Energy
English
Ethics
Evolution
Fluoride
Food
FTL
Garden Care
George W. Bush
Gerlich and Tscheuschner
GISS
Glaciers
GMOs
HadCRU
Haiti
Health
Himalayan Rock Salt
HITRAN
Holocaust Denial
Home Brewing
How It Looks From Here
html
Humor
Information
Infrared Spectroscopy
IPCC
Iran
ISIS
Islam
Islamophobia
Israel
Ketotifen Fumarate
Law
Lawn Care
Leibniz
Lisbon
Magnetism
Math
Medco
Medicine
Modeling
Molecules
Monopoly
Monsanto
Naphazoline hydrochloride
Neutrinos
Nietzsche
NIH
NIST
Noether's Theorem
Non-hazardous
Norton Ghost
Nuclear Warfare
Oil
Oil Spill
Olopatadine hydrochloride
Opinion
Orson Scott Card
Parody
Pataday
Patanol
Pesticides
Pheneramine maleate
Physics
Plumbing
Politics
Poll
Pope
POTUS
Prescriptions
Prop 65
Psychology
Quantum Mechanics
Quiz
Racism
Radiative Transfer
Relativity
Religion
Respiration
Senior Housing
Signs
Smoking
Specific Gravity
Statistics
Stock Market
Sugars
Sun Tzu
Surface Temperature
Surgeon General
Symantec
Target
Temperature
Terrorism
The Final Solution
The Holocaust History Project
Thermodynamics
Time
Trains
Units
Voltaire
von Clausewitz
Weather
White House
Wine
Yeast
Sunday, February 22, 2015
Friday, February 6, 2015
A Proposal To Reduce The Defense Budget (Opinion)
Disclaimer: This post represents my opinion only and is no reflection on the views of my employer.
There is no question that the Department of Defense is a huge part of the National Budget. I think that it is possible to make significant cuts in that budget without impairing our national capabilities. There are many issues in the Defense budget to include Healthcare, size of the force, entitlements, compensation etc. that are important, but I am not going to discuss those issues. Rather, my interest is in how the Department of Defense buys stuff.
A lot has been written about Acquisition Reform, and I am not going to write much about that topic except to say that every few years there is another reform effort that never seems to reach the vision of those who initiate it. A lot of very smart people work on this issue and fail, and I am not convinced that I am any smarter or more earnest than they are. Rather, I intend to propose fixing the system from the bottom up with a few radical policy changes that would greatly empower end users to get the goods that they need at effective prices.
There is no question that the Department of Defense is a huge part of the National Budget. I think that it is possible to make significant cuts in that budget without impairing our national capabilities. There are many issues in the Defense budget to include Healthcare, size of the force, entitlements, compensation etc. that are important, but I am not going to discuss those issues. Rather, my interest is in how the Department of Defense buys stuff.
A lot has been written about Acquisition Reform, and I am not going to write much about that topic except to say that every few years there is another reform effort that never seems to reach the vision of those who initiate it. A lot of very smart people work on this issue and fail, and I am not convinced that I am any smarter or more earnest than they are. Rather, I intend to propose fixing the system from the bottom up with a few radical policy changes that would greatly empower end users to get the goods that they need at effective prices.
Sunday, August 25, 2013
Proof that Dinosaurs and Humans Coexisted
Sunday, July 28, 2013
Which Is It?
Saturday, June 1, 2013
Strong, Mostly Grain Porter
I am a big fan of Porter. My previous batch of The President's Porter came out well. I decided that I would make a regular Porter. I am interested in moving into all-grain brewing, but I also had some malt extract from an old brewing kit that I wanted to use. So I decided to make a mostly all-grain porter with the exception that I would use up the remainder of the extract I had. I adjusted the amount of grains I used using the an extract to grain conversion.
Ingredients
Ingredients
- 19.4 oz blonde malt extract from an old brewing kit (I thought I'd use it up.)
- 7 lbs cracked American 2-row (Klages) malt
- 1 lbs cracked Munich malt
- 1 lbs cracked crystal malt 120
- 1/2 lbs cracked black patent malt
- 1/2 lbs cracked English chocolate malt
- 1/2 lbs cracked, roasted barley
- 1 oz German northern brewer hops
- 1 oz German Tettnang hops
- 3/4 cup dextrose
- 0.388 oz. Nottingham Dry Yeast
- 2.5 tsp diammonium phosphate
- 1 tsp Crosby & Baker yeast energizer
- 2 tsp gypsum
- 5-6 gallons Reverse Osmosis purified water
- 27 lbs ice
Labels:
Alcohol,
Ale,
Beer,
Biology,
Carbohydrates,
Home Brewing,
Yeast
Thursday, May 23, 2013
Eye Allergies: Patanol Still the Best For Me
Previously, I wrote about my experience with Patanol vs. Alaway. Since that time I have tried additional medications, and I thought I'd post an update.
The medications I've tried are:
The medications I've tried are:
- Patanol (0.1% solution of olopatadine hydrochloride).
- Pataday (0.2% solution of olopatadine hydrochloride).
- Alaway (Ketotifen Fumarate).
- Up & Up Eye Drops Allergy Relief (pheneramine maleate and naphazoline hydrochloride).
I previously wrote that both Alaway and Patanol worked well for me, but that Alaway had an uncomfortable sting. I now find the sting almost unbearable and prefer not to use Alaway, but I still do so in a pinch. Patanol works exceedingly well for me. I tried a free sample of Pataday; it worked fine, but I did not think it was any better than Patanol. The fourth option, which is Target's generic brand of allergy eye drops did absolutely nothing for me. No offense to Target; I like Target, but I think I'm a Patanol man.
Saturday, May 18, 2013
GMO-free Salt and Fluoride
Recently, I came across a blog with a face-palm entry about "GMO-free" pink Himalayan salt. Coincidentally, I was engaged in a conversation with friends who are apparently concerned about a government conspiracy to poison us with fluoride. Putting the two thoughts together sparked my curiosity. How much fluoride is in natural salts such as Himalayan Pink Rock Salt, and is it too much?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)